Good morning!

-TCoL

Missed our last feature article? What You Actually Pay to Take Credit Cards

The average professional spends 28% of their workday on email. The other 72% is spent recovering from it. 

Lindy is an AI assistant that reads every email, sorts out the noise, and drafts replies that sound like you. Before calls, it texts you a brief over iMessage with context from your last conversation. You text it back like a friend. And it only takes one minute to set up.

 Try Lindy free for 7 days

The enlightened company trusts its people, throws out the rulebook, and everyone stays happy and productive. It is a good story, but it leaves out certain key parts.

One disclosure before we start: The Co. Letter takes no payment, commission, or anything of value from Netflix or any company named here. What follows is our read, nothing more.

The honest version is that “no policy” is the wrong name for it. The companies where this works have not removed the rules. They have traded one rule, the rule about counting days, for a different set of rules about how you leave your work before you go. That trade is the whole thing, and it is worth understanding before you decide the idea is brilliant or reckless.

Netflix is the famous case, so start there. Since 2003, the company has not handed out vacation days and does not track them. Its culture memo states the policy in two words, “take vacation,” and pairs it with an expense policy barely longer: act in the company’s best interests. There is no separate bucket for sick days, personal days, or vacation. Nothing accrues. Time off is a conversation between you and your manager, not a balance in a system.

The logic is clean. Netflix already judged its salaried people on what they produced, not the hours they logged. If you do not count hours, why count days?

Two things about this usually get left out.

The first is that it is narrower than the legend. Netflix limits the approach to salaried staff and says plainly that it plays out differently by role and location. Hourly workers and many overseas offices sit under laws no company can opt out of. In much of the country, paid sick leave is now something you must provide, and sometimes track, no matter how open your broader policy is. We mapped where those mandates apply, and where they do not, in The Sick Day You Saw Coming. An untracked plan does not satisfy those rules on its own.

The second should give you more pause. Owners worry that people will take too much. The evidence runs the other way. Studies of these policies have generally found that employees often take the same amount of time off, or less, because without a number, no one knows what normal looks like. People hedge. They worry that three weeks will read as slacking, or cost them at review time. Left alone, the policy does not produce rest. It produces a low, steady reluctance to unplug.

Which brings me to a reader who has run a version of this for twelve years with no real trouble. Their experience is useful because it is not magic, but discipline.

Their policy comes with strict conditions, and they are the unglamorous kind. Before you take time off, your work needs to be current, not something you will catch up on later. You brief your manager and your teammates, not just that you will be gone, but on where everything you own stands and what is likely to surface while you are away. If you carry customer relationships, you tell those contacts you will be out and who will look after them in the meantime. The freedom to leave is earned by making your absence a non-event for everyone who depends on you. That is what good employees should do anyway. What has been removed is the accounting, not the accountability.

The other half of their approach is how they hire. It is not “abuse the policy and you are gone.” It is a culture of being careful in the hiring process, slow and deliberate about who they let in, so the wrong people rarely get in at all. Get that right, the thinking goes, and the time-off policy needs almost no policing, because the people you hired are not the kind to exploit it. The occasional bad employee tends to surface and leave (or get let go) for reasons that have nothing to do with vacation.

Careful hiring answers the worry owners actually have, that people will take too much. It leaves the opposite and common problem untouched: the conscientious employees that you work hardest to hire are the ones who take too little, for fear of looking like slackers, and they wear themselves down. You cannot hire your way out of that, but you should encourage your employees to take time off, just like Netflix.

None of this makes untracked time off right for everyone. If you employ hourly workers, sit in a state with strict leave-tracking rules, or do not yet trust your managers to hold people to a standard without having to track time off, a conventional policy is the safer tool.

For the rest, the version that works is not the free-for-all the branding suggests. It swaps the burden of counting for the burden of preparing, and it asks people to leave their work in a state where their absence costs no one. That takes careful hiring underneath it and leaders who take the time first. Built that way, it carries less risk than it appears to, even if, at the start, it takes some nerve.

The Co. Letter offers general information, not legal or HR advice. Employment and leave laws vary by state and locality; confirm your own obligations with qualified legal counsel before you change any policy.

Have an interesting business question and need a free bit of advice? Send your question to [email protected]. No confidential info, please!